Originally my intention was to report the whole matter to the Secretary of State, and I now have the honour to do so. In so doing, I seek the protection to which I think I am entitled in the circumstances. I desire, in the first place, to draw the attention of the Secretary of State to a somewhat curious fact. The papers connected with the question of the Court Vacation have been submitted to the Secretary of State by His Excellency the Governor because of the incidental allusion to the action of the Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce in paragraph 5 of my letter of 12th March on another subject. The Secretary of State has expressed his opinion on one point which arose out of the question, but his opinion has not been invited on the main question involved. Moreover, there were other allusions in that letter which it seems to me might also have been explained in the same way. One of them was specially important: the general attitude of the Government towards the Judges. This is a matter which has caused me a great deal of annoyance ever since I have been in the Colony; I have referred to it again and again in my letters, but little attention has been paid to it; but it is very germane to the question which has been raised in this correspondence, because, in my opinion, the attitude of the Government is highly prejudicial to the dignity of the Bench, and the deplorable condition of inertness in which I found the Court on my arrival is entirely due to the lack of recognition and general ignoring of the position of the Judges by the Government.
I have long intended, as appears in many of my letters, to report on the whole subject to the Secretary of State; but I have always deferred doing so, preferring to try and ameliorate matters by representations to the Government. I refer to the questions now, not in any querulous spirit, but only because the question of the dignity of the Bench has been raised, and because, in my opinion, the attitude of the Government does not respect that dignity, and because it was specially unmindful of it on this occasion, with special reference...
ESS
240
-vizenre: is owe "ino enew ako te hua,bedlostus vizesin, ented as
ent toob sit or Josido
.nudeos Moerin? sexalsi
GUNBO Pit mend easi
80*
."sual reten I Hollw 0**uro” elle to nobežneni to sorte ent
to valmib are eathulang ativon at bib Mood I modros
*** cada fast ext
Ionel
besestqxe tôn,koldos the Xros "etic kan tomsvol eta mog
de vitaeth non
va ucitoa p. of Denevbu nəiniyo XCA
ya har eaob ors: boddo wr birow wi nohiv terle catİŞ YAB
est to egidaeng so'd dena parinvoria eni ball no ̧ntit barfom:~. TAO, {%
evell or sox, at muro beabal ton (bunubɑ VIIameos bør done
mouniro atd ni dala mulwor's av→ ti od nekN or behneČNİ “Ovo
.00 ob od **D480094 ton asw ?!
Það beraster vino conelfsor
- Iɛnh MAJA! adano." own Broz ne.JEW MOJAŊEa) e ci vitaminbiosi
squscad vĺno mede bev
·MIPL KO MAGJOI A
fqennetu a nisiyza of rected ei edemont e
of hab^s. at quhet met es ibrogɛerroɔ at en od bonenqari folzw
1 * [IA .8383 F to wadeno92 4.5
hoda to voligo
ANC KÌ *An awella & ta' a
dua arkivon ecoh bar 1 tre.IN MON
5
こ
JB. w Talle bra asoredɛlzrokiD
10 testam s chot 14
na dud MÓTTAK 26 a From 03
tnt Inlennara plovioɑva usw JB;'v
I
Inla£tenor med bax erob bar :
8:05 "ABC of on od sušniqmua da.**
in à sve 26', to=[[eox, eli w buntot mood bar nmolniço ea ovbe
R
nevoanor herrey, t has ,"%{[armebian)" be "c:97 vino as c
dalle n' batant's teni ̋o e* of somonaten via oralo end duoda kw
30..
DIE H
twin to wody al
mate toa? le Jesupen of wond
ule bora.fang: ɛih gd bio,oba uubanotų brid no. dedy nožou metatuen ads or van alde zi met: aut edt gulerogen vi ko: OVO
nale recta tog ett no on antimotei vino bes、932
to anot.theie bus zele src Jłłw znezalando *SY
t
ehs. mod ba
solved Ist fc0 g
rochnatona. Mamot vrime bien r
28
(SAW I
originally my intention to report the whole matter to the
Secretary of State, and I now have the honour to do so. In so
doing I seek the protestion to which I think I am entitled in
the circumstances: I desire in the first place to draw the
attention of the Secretary of State to a somewhat curious fact.
The papers connected with the question of the Court Vacation
have been submitted to the Secretary of State by His Excellency
the Governor because of the incidental allusion to the action
of the Chaian of the Chamber of Commerce in paragraph 5 of my
letter of 12th. March on another subjedt. The Secretary of
State has expressed his opinion on one point which arose out
of the question, but his opinion has not been invited on the
main question involved. Moreover there were other allusions in
that letter which it seems to me might also have been explained
in the same way. One of the them was specially important: the
general attitude of the Government towards the Judges. This is
a matter which has caused me a great deal of annoyance ever
since I have been in the Colony; I have referred to it again and
again in my letters, but little attention has been paid to it;
but it is very gerrane to the question which has been raised
in this correspondece, because in my opinion the attitude of
the Government is highly prejudicial to the dignity of the
Bonch, and the deplorable condition of inertness in which I
found the Court on my arrival is entirely due to the lack of
recognition and general ignoring of the position of the Judges
by the Government
•
I have long intended, as appears in many of
my letters, to report on the whole subject to the Secretary of
State; but I have always deferred doing so, preferring to try
and ameliorate matters by representations to the Government. I
refer to the questions now, not in any querrulous spirit, but
only because the question of the dignity of the Bench has been
raised, and because in my opinion the attitude of the Govern-
-ment does not respect that dignity, and because it was
specially unmindful of it on this occasion,
with special
reference
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.